Scientific revolution = paradigm change
The world is what it is, but how we know and think about it can change from person to person and moment to moment.
A new idea does not, in the first instance, change physical reality, only the mental states of the people who conceive it and understand it. What it does change in society is our appreciation of the possibilities. Newton's laws opened the way for space travel and Bernoulli showed us how to fly. The idea behind this site is to totally change our vision of the world and ourselves. We are not aliens in an alien and damaged world, we are divine members of god. Quantum mechanics takes us deep into the heart of this divine world. Thomas Kuhn: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
For two thousand years western civilization has been corrupted by the belief that there is something wrong with the material world.
The sources of this error are to be found our ancient literary foundations, the Bible and Classical Greek philosophy. Genesis explains that god ruined paradise because the first humans disobeyed them. Many of the Greeks, from Parmenides through Plato to the Gnostic streak in the early Christian theologians, emphasized that this ephemeral world is but a shadow of an eternal heaven. Gnosticism - Wikipedia
This situation is is reflected in the ceaseless culture wars between a ruling class which takes its direction from its spurious dreams of heaven and the evidence based community, scientific, journalistic and judicial, which is grounded on close observation of reality.
The Church, like dictators before and since, forced Galileo to deny what he had seen with his own eyes on pain of death. Since that time, most branches of science except theology have broken free from institutional control. The political power of science resides in its ability to provide superior weapons, heath care and communications.The power of realty is still moot around the world as we see in many governments moved more by perceived entitlement than fact. Galileo affair - Wikipedia
Aristotle, breaking away from his mentor Plato, found a new way to think about the heavens, finding a path from physics to theology. His first step was to bring Plato's eternal forms down to earth with a model we call hylomorphism. He expanded this to potential and actuality which gave him a foundation for the study of knowledge. His axiom that no potential can actualize itself led him propose the existence of a first unmoved mover to which he associated the attributes of god: perfect knowledge and happiness. Hylomorphism - Wikipedia, Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, Aristotle, Metaphysics: XII vii: The divine life of the prime mover (1072b14 sqq.)
Early versions of Christianity were build on Platonism, but Christian military operations against Islam brought the work of Aristotle home to Europe. His books were widely translated from Greek and Arabic into Latin and enabled Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas to completely revise Christian theology, producing a new model of god which remains current in the Church. Albertus Magnus - Wikipedia, Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica, John Paul II (1983): Code of Canon Law, c. 252: §3
More than a century ago, scientific midwives like Planck, Einstein and Meitner began the delivery of quantum mechanics, which has revolutionized our lives in many ways, not least with nuclear weapons and smartphones. For a long time quantum mechanics languished as a simple physical theory, but in the 1980s it began to emerge that quantum systems could be used for communication and computation, opening the way for a transition from physics to cognitive science. The field, now styled quantum information science is expanding rapidly. Nuclear fission - Wikipedia, Quantum computing - Wikipedia
Despite many difficulties, it is now clear that quantum mechanics is a significant step along the path to understanding the true nature of the world. My purpose here is to look for a modern analogue of Aristotle's final step from physics to theology. This, I hope, will convince some people at least that our so called material world is divine, that it plays all the roles traditionally attributed to god, and that we should treat it and ourselves as sacred beings.
Of course the task proposed here is well beyond me, but it must be done. I have neither met nor heard of anybody even remotely interested in working on it. Traditional theological delusions are so deeply embedded in us that the ability to see god in a new way is almost extinct. My purpose is to make a tentative start that will perhaps attract a competent person or organization to take on the job and bring it to completion.
Watch this site . . .
[Revised 20 March 2021]
|
Copyright:
You may copy this material freely provided only that you quote fairly and provide a link (or reference) to your source.
1967, before the Church let me go
Further readingBooks
Crotty (2016), Robert, Jesus, His Mother, Her Sister Mary and Mary Magdalene: The Gnostic Background to the Gospel of John, David Lovell Publishing 2016 ' The Gospel of John has always been a difficult book to interpret. The differences between John and the Synoptics have always been a stumbling block for students. There have been rather simplistic attempts at exegesis: Jesus changed water into wine at Cana because he did not want the bridegroom ridiculed; he washed the feet of the disciples as an act of humility; he brought Mary and John together as mother and son at the foot of the cross because he wanted his mother cared for in her old age.
This book takes up these problems. It demonstrates that the present text has followed a long and tortured journey from Jewish Gnosticism to a Christian Gnostic compendium, later extensively edited by Roman Christianity. The result is a surprising re-reading. The book throws light on a different Jesus to the canonical one (he is not human), a different Mother (she is Sophia, a divine emanation), a different Sister Mary (she is Eve), a different Mary Magdalene (she is the Beloved Disciple), a new Judas (he is not a betrayer and was the first to receive the Gnostic Eucharist) and a festering confrontation between Peter and the Beloved Disciple. The Roman Christians disagreed on all these interpretations and heavily edited the gospel in order to silence its Gnostic statement. This book will show how the gospel of John should be read at the present time to take account of this complex tradition history.
Amazon
back |
Kuhn, Thomas S, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, U of Chicago Press 1962, 1970, 1996 Introduction: 'a new theory, however special its range of application, is seldom just an increment to what is already known. Its assimilation requires the reconstruction of prior theory and the re-evaluation of prior fact, an intrinsically revolutionary process that is seldom completed by a single man, and never overnight.' [p 7]
Amazon
back |
Links
Albertus Magnus - Wikipedia, Albertus Magnus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Albertus Magnus, O.P. (before 1200 – November 15, 1280), also known as Albert the Great and Albert of Cologne, is a Catholic saint. He was a German Dominican friar and a Catholic bishop. . . . Scholars such as James A. Weisheipl and Joachim R. Söder have referred to him as the greatest German philosopher and theologian of the Middle Ages. . . . Albert was the first to comment on virtually all of the writings of Aristotle, thus making them accessible to wider academic debate. The study of Aristotle brought him to study and comment on the teachings of Muslim academics, notably Avicenna and Averroes, and this would bring him into the heart of academic debate.' back |
Aristotle, Metaphysics XII: vii, The divine life of the prime mover, "On such a principle, then, depend the heavens and the world of nature. And it is a life such as the best which we enjoy, and enjoy for but a short time (for it is ever in this state, which we cannot be), since its actuality is also pleasure. . . . Therefore the possession rather than the receptivity is the divine element which thought seems to contain, and the act of contemplation is what is most pleasant and best. If, then, God is always in that good state in which we sometimes are, this compels our wonder; and if in a better this compels it yet more. And God is in a better state. And life also belongs to God; for the actuality of thought is life, and God is that actuality; and God's self-dependent actuality is life most good and eternal. We say therefore that God is a living being, eternal, most good, so that life and duration continuous and eternal belong to God; for this is God.' 1072b14 sqq. back |
Galileo affair - Wikipedia, Galileo affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The Galileo affair (Italian: il processo a Galileo Galilei) began around 1610[1] and culminated with the trial and condemnation of Galileo Galilei by the Roman Catholic Inquisition in 1633. Galileo was prosecuted for his support of heliocentrism, the astronomical model in which the Earth and planets revolve around the Sun at the centre of the Solar System. ' back |
Gnosticism - Wikipedia, Gnosticism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Gnosticism (from Ancient Greek: γνωστικός gnōstikós, "having knowledge") is a collection of ancient religious ideas and systems which originated in the first century AD among early Christian and Jewish sects. These various groups emphasised personal spiritual knowledge (gnosis) over orthodox teachings, traditions, and ecclesiastical authority. Gnostic cosmogony generally presents a distinction between a supreme, hidden God and a blind, malevolent demiurge responsible for creating the material universe. Viewing this material existence as flawed or evil, Gnostics considered the principal element of salvation to be direct knowledge of the supreme divinity in the form of mystical or esoteric insight.' back |
Hylomorphism - Wikipedia, Hylomorphism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 'Hylomorphism (Greek ὑλο- hylo-, "wood, matter" + -morphism < Greek μορφή, morphē, "form") is a philosophical theory developed by Aristotle, which analyzes substance into matter and form. Substances are conceived of as compounds of form and matter.' back |
John Palmer (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Parmenides,
'Immediately after welcoming Parmenides to her abode, the goddess describes as follows the content of the revelation he is about to receive:
You must needs learn all things,/ both the unshaken heart of well-rounded reality/ and the notions of mortals, in which there is no genuine trustworthiness./ Nonetheless these things too will you learn, how what they resolved/ had actually to be, all through all pervading. (Fr. 1.28b-32) ' back |
John Paul II (1983), Code of Canon Law, c. 252: §3, Canon 252: §3. ' There are to be classes in dogmatic theology, always grounded in the written word of God together with sacred tradition; through these, students are to learn to penetrate more intimately the mysteries of salvation, especially with St. Thomas as a teacher. There are also to be classes in moral and pastoral theology, canon law, liturgy, ecclesiastical history, and other auxiliary and special disciplines, according to the norm of the prescripts of the program of priestly formation.' back |
Nuclear fission - Wikipedia, Nuclear fission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Nuclear fission of heavy elements was discovered on December 17, 1938 by German Otto Hahn and his assistant Fritz Strassmann at the suggestion of Austrian-Swedish physicist Lise Meitner who explained it theoretically in January 1939 along with her nephew Otto Robert Frisch. Frisch named the process by analogy with biological fission of living cells. For heavy nuclides, it is an exothermic reaction which can release large amounts of energy both as electromagnetic radiation and as kinetic energy of the fragments (heating the bulk material where fission takes place).' back |
Quantum computing - Wikipedia, Quantum computing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' Quantum computing began in the early 1980s, when physicist Paul Benioff proposed a quantum mechanical model of the Turing machine. Richard Feynman and Yuri Manin later suggested that a quantum computer had the potential to simulate things that a classical computer could not. In 1994, Peter Shor developed a quantum algorithm for factoring integers that had the potential to decrypt RSA-encrypted communications. Despite ongoing experimental progress since the late 1990s, most researchers believe that "fault-tolerant quantum computing [is] still a rather distant dream." ' back |
Richard Kraut (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Plato, ' Plato (429–347 B.C.E.) is, by any reckoning, one of the most dazzling writers in the Western literary tradition and one of the most penetrating, wide-ranging, and influential authors in the history of philosophy. . . . Few other authors in the history of philosophy approximate him in depth and range: perhaps only Aristotle (who studied with him), Aquinas, and Kant would be generally agreed to be of the same rank.' back |
Simon Bone and Matias Castro, A Brief History of Quantum Computing, ' Strange as it sounds, the computer of tomorrow could be built around a cup of coffee. The caffeine molecule is just one of the possible building blocks of a 'quantum computer', a new type of computer that promises to provide mind boggling performance that can break secret codes in a matter of seconds.' back |
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Thomas Aquinas: The medieval theological classic online : 'Because the doctor of Catholic truth ought not only to teach the proficient, but also to instruct beginners (according to the Apostle: As unto little ones in Christ, I gave you milk to drink, not meat -- 1 Cor. 3:1-2), we purpose in this book to treat of whatever belongs to the Christian religion, in such a way as may tend to the instruction of beginners. We have considered that students in this doctrine have not seldom been hampered by what they have found written by other authors, partly on account of the multiplication of useless questions, articles, and arguments, partly also because those things that are needful for them to know are not taught according to the order of the subject matter, but according as the plan of the book might require, or the occasion of the argument offer, partly, too, because frequent repetition brought weariness and confusion to the minds of readers.'
back |
Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, Unmoved mover - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, ' The unmoved mover (Ancient Greek: ὃ οὐ κινούμενον κινεῖ, romanized: ho ou kinoúmenon kineî, lit. 'that which moves without being moved'] or prime mover (Latin: primum movens) is a concept advanced by Aristotle as a primary cause (or first uncaused cause) or "mover" of all the motion in the universe. As is implicit in the name, the unmoved mover moves other things, but is not itself moved by any prior action. In Book 12 (Greek: Λ) of his Metaphysics, Aristotle describes the unmoved mover as being perfectly beautiful, indivisible, and contemplating only the perfect contemplation: self-contemplation. He equates this concept also with the active intellect. This Aristotelian concept had its roots in cosmological speculations of the earliest Greek pre-Socratic philosophers and became highly influential and widely drawn upon in medieval philosophy and theology. St. Thomas Aquinas, for example, elaborated on the unmoved mover in the Quinque viae. ' back |
|